There's a fine line between "didn't do anything wrong" and "could've done / handled things better". Typically I find that my contributions to messed up situations is that I could have handled things a different way to arrive at a better outcome. Doesn't mean that what I did was WRONG, just not EFFECTIVE. If I measure it that way, then I'm like JB, in that 9 times out of 10, I didn't do anything wrong. Now that 10th time.......

I tend to be way more b/w than that... there's a right way and a wrong way to handle things. If you can handle things better, then I wouldn't say you "didn't do
anything wrong", BTJM. And even if you disagree with that and find that there's a difference, the bottom line is that you still contributed to the messed up situation one way or another, which means you have to accept some of the responsibility.
Some people (not talking about you or JB or anyone in particular) like to avoid responsibility for their wrongdoing by using those types of "well I could've handled it differently, but I didn't do anything wrong" excuses... and that's dangerous and it yields to harmful pride, IMO. Folks never want to admit when they're wrong. I hate that.
And another thing, I'm concerned (again, in general) with people who never think they're wrong, and others are always doing them wrong. Really? So 90% of the time you're right and the other person is wrong? Wow. The funny part is that if you got those 9 people together, they would probably all agree that you were the one who was wrong and you're the only one who doesn't think you were wrong. LOL (but of course, you could've handled things a little differently).
