Topic: Fantasy Football (Read 15210 times)

BEATBOXERZ · « **Reply #100 on:** October 03, 2006, 10:01:49 PM »

Quote from: musiqisme26 on October 03, 2006, 08:39:44 PM

where & what reply and if i get T.O. ill exchange steve smith

Man that's a tough one! What you gonna do SJ?

sjonathan02 · « **Reply #101 on:** October 03, 2006, 10:25:15 PM »

Quote from: BEATBOXERZ on October 03, 2006, 10:01:49 PM

Man that's a tough one! What you gonna do SJ?

I'm not sure, yet. Can we only propose one trade at a time? If so, perhaps you need to offer me a trade, and we'll work it out that way.

BEATBOXERZ · « **Reply #102 on:** October 03, 2006, 10:35:38 PM »

Quote from: sjonathan02 on October 03, 2006, 10:25:15 PM

I'm not sure, yet. Can we only propose one trade at a time? If so, perhaps you need to offer me a trade, and we'll work it out that way.

I don't really have any recievers on that level as T.O. or S. Smith. I have some good one, but not great ones. But it works in my favor beacause dem greats one see double coverages and the good ones get to shine. I'll take a look at my rooster though and holla at you

sjonathan02 · « **Reply #103 on:** October 04, 2006, 06:22:20 AM »

Quote from: BEATBOXERZ on October 03, 2006, 10:35:38 PM

I don't really have any recievers on that level as T.O. or S. Smith. I have some good one, but not great ones. But it works in my favor beacause dem greats one see double coverages and the good ones get to shine. I'll take a look at my rooster though and holla at you

No problem.

DBG2k5 · « **Reply #104 on:** October 04, 2006, 08:19:28 PM »

Quote from: favoritepsalm1 on October 03, 2006, 11:22:56 AM

Week 4 results:

Holy Rollers def BLACK SPYDERZ 100.75 - 83.65
DA VIRGINIA GOAT def VT 50.50 - 27.80
da nu 9ers def FortCampbell Falcons 85.95 - 78.10
MaxxBeatdownz def Dallas Cowboys 110.85 - 108.00
JamRock Ballers def Hit Squad 86.05 - 81.35

Standings:

1. Holy Rollers 4-0
2. MaxxBeatdownz 3-1
3. JamRock Ballers 3-1
4. BLACK SPYDERZ 3-1
5. da nu 9ers 2-2
6. Dallas Cowboys 2-2
7. FortCampbell Falcons 1-3
8. VT 1-3
9. DA VIRGINIA GOAT 1-3
10.Hit Squad 0-4

I have Randy Moss AND Chad Johnson. And I'm 0 and 4...hmmm...

musiqisme26 · « **Reply #105 on:** October 04, 2006, 09:09:37 PM »

Quote from: DBG2k5 on October 04, 2006, 08:19:28 PM

I have Randy Moss AND Chad Johnson. And I'm 0 and 4...hmmm...

its funny how without both moss and culpepper the vikings are a better team

musiqisme26 · « **Reply #106 on:** October 10, 2006, 02:13:28 PM »

do any of yall wanna do fantasy basketball?????

favoritepsalm1 · « **Reply #107 on:** October 11, 2006, 09:21:36 AM »

Week 5 Scores:

Dallas Cowboys def Holy Rollers 95.60 - 65.35
BLACK SPYDERZ def DA VIRGINIA GOAT 108.20 - 38.80
FortCampbell Falcons def VT 100.00 - 53.70
JamRock Ballers def MaxxBeatdownz 104.90 - 60.95
da nu 9ers def Hit Squad 69.80 - 52.05

Standings after week 5:
JamRockBallers 4-1
BLACKSPYDERZ 4-1
Holy Rollers 4-1
MaxxBeatdownz 3-2
Dallas Cowboys 3-2
da nu 9ers 3-2
FortCampbell Falcons 2-3
VT 1-4
DA VIRGINIA GOAT 1-4
Hit Squad 0-5

favoritepsalm1 · « **Reply #108 on:** October 11, 2006, 12:36:10 PM »

I just vetoed two trades so that there was more time for the other teams to review them. Something about an 0-5 team yelling "Fire Sale" and then trading off arguably his two best players. Not saying that anybody is trying anything shady, but I just have to make sure. One team was trading Chad Johnson for Willis McGahee and Clinton Portis for Isaac Bruce. We unfortunately already have one dead team in the league. I just don't want to have another one. If nobody else sees a problem with the trades, let me know.

musiqisme26 · « **Reply #109 on:** October 11, 2006, 03:02:48 PM »

Quote from: favoritepsalm1 on October 11, 2006, 12:36:10 PM

I just vetoed two trades so that there was more time for the other teams to review them. Something about an 0-5 team yelling "Fire Sale" and then trading off arguably his two best players. Not saying that anybody is trying anything shady, but I just have to make sure. One team was trading Chad Johnson for Willis McGahee and Clinton Portis for Isaac Bruce. We unfortunately already have one dead team in the league. I just don't want to have another one. If nobody else sees a problem with the trades, let me know.

im a lil beside myself because i was giving up an all pro RB for an all pro WR but heres the kicker mcgahee has like 50+ pts to chad's 20 pts.

DBG2k5 · « **Reply #110 on:** October 11, 2006, 03:10:07 PM »

Quote from: favoritepsalm1 on October 11, 2006, 12:36:10 PM

I just vetoed two trades so that there was more time for the other teams to review them. Something about an 0-5 team yelling "Fire Sale" and then trading off arguably his two best players. Not saying that anybody is trying anything shady, but I just have to make sure. One team was trading Chad Johnson for Willis McGahee and Clinton Portis for Isaac Bruce. We unfortunately already have one dead team in the league. I just don't want to have another one. If nobody else sees a problem with the trades, let me know.

Well, it's understandable how you feel. But, not only do I like to compete, but I like seeing competitiion. I really would like to see some real match-ups take place at the top or in the middle. Everyone here can probably agree that if I ACTUALLY win and because of my ONE win, I prevented someone in the middle to make a move that'll get them over the hump, it wouldn't look very good. Plus, Pennington did it for me, when, as a QB, gave me negative points.

Now, Fire Sale probably was a bit too aggressive, but my intentions were to see some competition really develop in the middle or towards the top.

vtguy84 · « **Reply #111 on:** October 11, 2006, 03:11:15 PM »

I need the link again...

DBG2k5 · « **Reply #112 on:** October 11, 2006, 03:11:18 PM »

Quote from: musiqisme26 on October 10, 2006, 02:13:28 PM

do any of yall wanna do fantasy basketball?????

set it up, I'm in.

sjonathan02 · « **Reply #113 on:** October 11, 2006, 04:38:34 PM »

Quote from: DBG2k5 on October 11, 2006, 03:10:07 PM

Well, it's understandable how you feel. But, not only do I like to compete, but I like seeing competitiion. I really would like to see some real match-ups take place at the top or in the middle. Everyone here can probably agree that if I ACTUALLY win and because of my ONE win, I prevented someone in the middle to make a move that'll get them over the hump, it wouldn't look very good. Plus, Pennington did it for me, when, as a QB, gave me negative points.

Now, Fire Sale probably was a bit too aggressive, but my intentions were to see some competition really develop in the middle or towards the top.

So, are we saying that we can go ahead with the trades that were vetoed?

musiqisme26 · « **Reply #114 on:** October 11, 2006, 05:22:41 PM »

basketball sign up

http://www.learngospelmusic.com/forums/index.php/topic,34610.0.html

favoritepsalm1 · « **Reply #115 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:13:15 AM »

Quote

So, are we saying that we can go ahead with the trades that were vetoed?

I guess so,

Please resubmit the original submitted trade offers and I will approve those first. Then we'll go from there.

musiqisme26 · « **Reply #116 on:** October 12, 2006, 10:14:51 AM »

thank you kindly

favoritepsalm1 · « **Reply #117 on:** October 17, 2006, 02:39:23 PM »

There is a trade being contested as too lopsided. Please either post here or send me an e-mail (favoritepsalm1@yahoo.com) if you feel the same:

Clinton Portis & Reggie Williams for Jason Witten and Isaac Bruce.

I will remain unbiased and not voice my opinion on this one. Please respond quickly.

sjonathan02 · « **Reply #118 on:** October 17, 2006, 02:48:15 PM »

Quote from: favoritepsalm1 on October 17, 2006, 02:39:23 PM

There is a trade being contested as too lopsided. Please either post here or send me an e-mail (favoritepsalm1@yahoo.com) if you feel the same:

Clinton Portis & Reggie Williams for Jason Witten and Isaac Bruce.

I will remain unbiased and not voice my opinion on this one. Please respond quickly.

As one of the people involved in the trade, how does this affect the rest of the league. I could see if one team was dominating the league and was issuing or being issued this trade, but that isn't the case.

It was offered and accepted by the two individuals, that shouldn't be a problem.

DBG2k5 · « **Reply #119 on:** October 17, 2006, 03:15:12 PM »

And with me being the other party of the trade, please understand that the trade you saw was not the ORIGINAL trade you're questioning. You're actually looking at a counter offer I made. And, after all the 'lopsided' trades I did...

...I CLEARLY REMEMBER WININING MY MATCHUP.

Author Topic: Fantasy Football (Read 15210 times)