But my question to you is that Doesn't the word say "workman is worthy of his hire"? Well why is it that whenever we talk about charging the church, there is an issue?. I would like to know why wasn't the church or why didn't they see the need to take care of this bassist before this issue came up?....Because they were getting a free service. It seems to me that he was already commited to them right.
I have a wife and four Children. I've been paying for 20 years. I love the Lord and have played my first five to seven years for free and getting $50.00, church folk writing badd checks to me, Preachers trying to stiff me when they say they were going to pay me is unacceptable.
So am I wrong to charge when church folk have taken advantage of me? If I wanted to deal with snakes, I would play in the secular genre, at least I'll know what I'm dealing with, but to have to deal with that in the church to me is wrong. That's why I thank GOD that he's given me wisdom. That's not to say that I wouldn't play for anyone for free. I have, I would just like an undertanding before I play for you. IF you know you have no money and you need me, it's ok, just tell me what's up. The problem is when you say you're gonna do something and never do it.
You being a preacher know that the church cannot operate on figs. It takes money to build buildings, air condition, heat, pews, instruments, sound, and qualified musicians that are annointed. Am I WRONG!!
Hey erickicks
It is almost 2:00 in the am when I am reading this
I will try to respond when I can think straight

Sorry for the delay