AOL FANTASY FOOTBALL!!

[Doubles22]

Who are Doug and Wendy anyway?

[musiqisme26]

Who are Doug and Wendy anyway?

dude i was looking hard......i even googled it

[sjonathan02]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Whiners


THIS is why I'm the SITCOM KING!!!

[sjonathan02]

sjon lets get some things clear on a personal level within my own house and i dont know you personally outside of LGM i talk about you in high regards with my wife and how much respect i have for you but if something dont make sense to me i will question it........you talk how team lamonte will be at a disadvantage however Garcia will outscore Owens every week and you say im not hurting but lets be real i have a rb on a bye and my top scoring wr is out for how long is anybodys guess but i shouldnt be put at a unfair position bcuz my team is good its like i have to lose in order to make deals good for me..........i apologize for attacking your personal character but it doesnt help when i need a valid reason to your decision and your reply is pwaaahahahahaha or what ever and something wit doug and wendy

In regards to this post, I accept your apology.

With regards to your team, I find it very difficult to believe that your team is going to 'suffer' because one of your RBs has a bye this week.

If you examine your past wins, they haven't been because of your RBs OR Jeff Garcia. And, if you were looking for RBs, then why not trade for his RBs, as opposed to, his fantasy points leader?

In addition, Team Lamonte even with T.O. is weak, at the WR position and even with a upgrade at QB, their still a weak team overall.

Furthermore, your injured WR isn't going to miss the remainder of the season. So, I was thinking long term (i.e. playoffs) while I was thinking about the good of the league.

Andre Johnson, Randy Moss AND T.O.?!??!!?? Let's just give you the trophy now and call it a day.


Even YOU have to see that's way too much fire power for ONE team to have combined with Manning and Palmer? PREESH!!

You could win with that combo ALONE!!!  

You wouldn't NEED RBs; they'd be icing on your cake.
Again, that's what I based my decision on; and I stand by my last comment, if the rest of the members of the league feel that I have, in some way, slighted you and they find the trade agreeable, I have NO problems reversing my decision.

None whatsoever.

I hope we're still good, in general. After all, it's JUST a game.


BTW, trade or no trade, I'm probably STILL gonna get smashed on Sunday, ANYWAY.

[Doubles22]

I remember the Whiners.  They just didn't stick in my SNL memory as much as skits like Toonces the Driving Cat.

[sjonathan02]

I remember the Whiners.  They just didn't stick in my SNL memory as much as skits like Toonces the Driving Cat.

I used to love that skit, too.

[musiqisme26]

my team in general is lacking in rb's except barber also besides moss and johnson injured for another 3-4 weeks i have no other consistent wr. yes i have qb depth and they can only be played one at a time and should i really be penalized cuz i drafted smart........

As far as giving me the trophy now I humbly accept

so i still hope to have T.O. in my lineup sunday thank you and God Bless

[sjonathan02]

my team in general is lacking in rb's except barber also besides moss and johnson injured for another 3-4 weeks i have no other consistent wr. yes i have qb depth and they can only be played one at a time and should i really be penalized cuz i drafted smart........

As far as giving me the trophy now I humbly accept

so i still hope to have T.O. in my lineup sunday thank you and God Bless

It's now up to favpsalm or the rest of the members of the league.

I CAN tell you that one member of the league, when asked yesterday, said they had no problem with it.

[lordluvr]

It's now up to favpsalm or the rest of the members of the league.

I CAN tell you that one member of the league, when asked yesterday, said they had no problem with it.

I, for one, don't have a problem with the trade.  One thing I like about fantasy football is that we play the role of GM, without the impact of salary caps.  To that end, there will always be GM's that have a way of putting together great teams.  I don't think they should be penalized for doing so, even if the person(s) they do business with are put at a competitive disadvantage.  This is coming from someone who obviously stinks as a GM, but I'm not gonna hate on the 9ers squad if the GM makes good moves.  My vote- if it's ok with Lamonte, then it's ok with me.  Hopefully, I'll play Lamonte later this season.   

[sjonathan02]

I, for one, don't have a problem with the trade.  One thing I like about fantasy football is that we play the role of GM, without the impact of salary caps.  To that end, there will always be GM's that have a way of putting together great teams.  I don't think they should be penalized for doing so, even if the person(s) they do business with are put at a competitive disadvantage.  This is coming from someone who obviously stinks as a GM, but I'm not gonna hate on the 9ers squad if the GM makes good moves.  My vote- if it's ok with Lamonte, then it's ok with me.  Hopefully, I'll play Lamonte later this season.   

Your vote has been cast and counted.

[Doubles22]

I already beat Lamonte.  But I haven't played musiqisme yet so it halfway affects me.  Technically, I can't do anything about the fact that an agreement to this trade is a page from the Matt Millen book of GM ethics.  But.....

*hoping Peyton Manning has a concussion in week 4 so that he doesn't play week 5* 

[sjonathan02]

I already beat Lamonte.  But I haven't played musiqisme yet so it halfway affects me.  Technically, I can't do anything about the fact that an agreement to this trade is a page from the Matt Millen book of GM ethics.  But.....

*hoping Peyton Manning has a concussion in week 4 so that he doesn't play week 5* 

I'm going to guess and put you in the 'yes' column.

[favoritepsalm1]

WHEW!  I got a quick minute to say something about this.  First of all, if Team Lamonte feels that it is justifiable and he needs those players that bad, then it's on him. Personally I would tough it out or wait for a QB controversy/injury to unfold.  As long as this isn't a case of a team dumping off all their good players for junk because they don't feel like playing anymore (seems like that happened last year) then so be it.  the strong are getting stronger, but that's the way it is sometimes.  I wish I could expound more, but I can't right now.  Gotta finish my babyback ribs before lunch is over 

[sjonathan02]

WHEW!  I got a quick minute to say something about this.  First of all, if Team Lamonte feels that it is justifiable and he needs those players that bad, then it's on him. Personally I would tough it out or wait for a QB controversy/injury to unfold.  As long as this isn't a case of a team dumping off all their good players for junk because they don't feel like playing anymore (seems like that happened last year) then so be it.  the strong are getting stronger, but that's the way it is sometimes.  I wish I could expound more, but I can't right now.  Gotta finish my babyback ribs before lunch is over 

The changes will be made in the next ten minutes. Musiqisme, good luck on Sunday, bruh.

Let me go lick my wounds, now, from the beating I'm about to get on Sunday.

[sjonathan02]

It......is........finished.




 


So, I guess no Gore for Barber trade after all, eh, musiq?

[musiqisme26]

I, for one, don't have a problem with the trade.  One thing I like about fantasy football is that we play the role of GM, without the impact of salary caps.  To that end, there will always be GM's that have a way of putting together great teams.  I don't think they should be penalized for doing so, even if the person(s) they do business with are put at a competitive disadvantage.  This is coming from someone who obviously stinks as a GM, but I'm not gonna hate on the 9ers squad if the GM makes good moves.  My vote- if it's ok with Lamonte, then it's ok with me.  Hopefully, I'll play Lamonte later this season.   

thank you sir

[musiqisme26]

thank you sir

thanks to those who have spoke up

[musiqisme26]

The changes will be made in the next ten minutes. Musiqisme, good luck on Sunday, bruh.

Let me go lick my wounds, now, from the beating I'm about to get on Sunday.

doesnt look like you'll have too many wounds to worry about.........whats really funny its gonna come down to QB's and WR's for us.......but its kinda in my favor

heres my outlook

both watson and welker wont be gamebreakers for us but what they put in will be like a bonus. the real story will be your combo of housh and brady and my combo of moss and palmer.......moss success is dependent on brady and housh on palmer my advantage will probaly be that housh has to compete with chad johnson for catches and moss well he has welker again he isnt a concern.......this is also a toss-up the pats defense is probaly the best in the league is a double edged sword for you

[sjonathan02]

doesnt look like you'll have too many wounds to worry about.........whats really funny its gonna come down to QB's and WR's for us.......but its kinda in my favor

heres my outlook

both watson and welker wont be gamebreakers for us but what they put in will be like a bonus. the real story will be your combo of housh and brady and my combo of moss and palmer.......moss success is dependent on brady and housh on palmer my advantage will probaly be that housh has to compete with chad johnson for catches and moss well he has welker again he isnt a concern.......this is also a toss-up the pats defense is probaly the best in the league is a double edged sword for you

Sadly, I see your point. The only scenario that really works for me is that Palmer throws to Housh because Chad is blanketed, while Brady throws to Welker because Moss is blanketed.


Other than that, it's pretty much a wrap for me. 

[favoritepsalm1]

Sadly, I see your point. The only scenario that really works for me is that Palmer throws to Housh because Chad is blanketed, while Brady throws to Welker because Moss is blanketed.


Other than that, it's pretty much a wrap for me. 

I'll be watching with great interest.