Maybe when GOD gives me something I should just state it and then leave it alone.
To me, that's the biggest problem with a lot of ministers/conversationalists in today's society. It's like....God gives you a word. You sense in your spirit that when it is delivered, it will strike like thunder...so you give it and leave it alone.
But think about it....it's seldom during a thunderstorm (really reaching...but hope you get my point) that the rainbow (the seal of the promise) comes. It's usually after the rain and thunder have COMPLETED THEIR WORK.
My point? I am no philosophical genius, but the QUESTIONS that come AFTER the word is given (I'm sure) are only for deeper understanding. Why is it that many of today's ministers can deliver a powerful, THUNDEROUS Word from God over the pulpit but never really remain available for questions, which is when the deeper level of understanding comes for most listeners?
Sometimes Ministers (not saying you, Bboy, in particular) are afraid of the questioning phase IMO because it may force them to admit that it was a "recycled" word that they got from elsewhere...or that they weren't as prepared as they should have been when they delivered it (you had to be with me at Revival this week to know where I'm coming from).
But anyway, people asking what "content" means IMO is a way of saying "dude...you gave a GREAT word that really pricked my spirit...and I almost got it....but I need a little bit more".
I see it as evidence of a great work BEING done....not THAT HAS BEEN done.
Then again, who am I?