Ok. So, in other words, you're giving your opinion of how history should look, because you don't agree with it?
Note that I'm not trying to call anyone out. I'm trying to help him and others out. If I was saying inaccurate things I would want someone to correct me.
Again my problem wasn't with the data (history) although, contrary to what others have said,
there were inaccuracies in the post.
So, no I wasn't giving my opinion on history. I was giving advice, one christian to another, on how I would go about phrasing certain aspects of it.
An extreme example I can give is once a young girl compared the oral tradition (a word she probable had never heard) to the telephone game.

So, if you bring that to a skeptic it's not much of a step for them then to turn around and say "well then that probably means stories were embellished and fabricated!"
And they would probably be right.