One thing I've noticed (in my area at least) is that some people will welcome some secular artist with open arms and sheild others out. When the Beyonce', Angie Stone, and the dude from the O'Jays who's name escapes me came out with "He Still Loves Me" the people were all over it. When Whitney Houston did "The Preacher's Wife" soundtrack people (myself included...lol) were all over that. When Bono, Mary J, and R-Kelly was in Kirk Franklin's "Lean on Me" everybody was all over that. When Patti Labelle 'went gospel', even amidst rumors of a "Labelle" reunion CD, people were all over that. People were down with Bebe Winans when he did r&b and when he did gospel. A lot of the time the excuse made by the listeners is "well, they started in the church..." BUT when Michelle Williams made the decision to be a gospel artist people a problem with it. When Coko made the the decision to be gospel artist people had a problem with it. They started in the church too, so if "they started in the church" is your reasoning what's the problem with Coko and Michelle? How do you not have a problem with those who go back to singing secular, but have a problem with thow who have made the decision to be gospel artist?
I don't pay attention to secular rap news (but my lil sis listens to it) but I haven't heard much from or about Pall Wall. Same for Chamillionare. They could have given their lives to God and given up secular music...maybe, maybe not.
What if that secular artist (whether he/she be the label name artist [like EWF, Elliot Yamin, etc] or someone who plays or produces for a secular artst) has a relationship with Christ but is in secular music because it pays more? Should they not be featured on a gospel artist's CD?
Brittsings87, I'll have to watch that video later. It's on youtube, right? Under "G. Craig"?