I know I know absolutely nothing concerning what it takes to run an organization the size of GM. But when I see article like the following it makes me wonder why take the risk?
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/gm-americredit-buy-3.5-billion-breaking/According to the article GM is planning on buying americredit for 3.5 billion dollars. Because people who have been trying to purchase cars from the GM dealerships are having trouble finding financing.
GM says that putting AmeriCredit under its wing is the next logical step in moving toward an IPO, and most analysts seem to agree. The carmaker had been criticized for not having an in-house financing arm in the past, but the new move should afford the company and its dealership network an added level of financing flexibility. It should also allow GM to return to leasing in a big way.
Is the money to be made off of subprime borrowers that great that the risk is justified?
Why was there a bailout for for GM?
you know what nevermind this is just why I don't buy stock in GM. I don't like their management.
If GM would have said something like we know not as many people can afford a $40,000 Truck therefore we are going to start producing this $12,000 truck which is not going to have any unnecessary changes for the next 10 years.
I mean if the 2011 model was the same as the 2010 model GM could work their inventory better. I understand the reason why they make small changes every year it spurs people to buy a car that they normally wouldn't buy.
I guess in the end I was really hoping GM would come out of this situation smaller, leaner, and ready to dominate China's and Korea's market.
Go buick!!!
Okay I'm done