I think the disconnect is that somewhere someone thinks that the church is taking money that pays the bills and putting it in the stock market OR that the church is putting money into random scams or something.
Truth is, the church already makes solid investments to some extent, especially if you look at your various organizations that your local church belongs to.
Truth is, if we applied these same misgivings to an individual, they would sound closed-minded and antiquated (sp?). Would you encourage a head of household to invest money they have left after paying the bills? Would you encourage them to be wise and seek proper financial advice? Would you yourself invest money to strengthen your financial standing and help you gain the capital to achieve your long term dreams and goals? If investing is such a bad thing why would it be okay to build wealth for your family, but not for the ministry?
To me, and maybe I'm missing something, it seems like if it's done properly, it's a legitimate way to use a world system to benefit the kingdom. That's kind of what the parable of the talents was saying anyway; take what God has given you, and go out and work it to bring a return to the kingdom on what God has invested in you. Money itself is a world system, and I don't see any reservations about using it. You mean to tell me the church can spend money but can't look for better ways to get a return on their money?
My reply... kinda random order....
No disconnect on my end. I'm clear that, at this point, we're talking about churches investing extra money in the stock market after conducting research and enlisting the aid of professionals to broker their investments.
I don't think investing is "such a bad thing" at all. I know you weren't directing this solely to me, but just for the record, I never said it was a bad thing. I think what I've consistently said is something along the lines of: I would never advise a church to invest in the stock market.
I think there's a difference in the way individuals manage their money and the way churches manage its money, so I can't really get with that comparison. For one, churches are governed by laws, bylaws, Biblical instructions, and its governing body. Furthermore, after paying the bills, a head of household can do whatever he wants with his money. A church, on the other hand, should do its Bible-mandated purpose: ministry. I'm reminded of the thread we had on fundraising. SisT said something that I've never been able to forget, and though it's a totally different subject, the principle applies. Churches are to be funded by tithes and offering. If they can't do what they want to do based on tithe and offering, then they are doing too much. I would venture to add, though I'm sure many will disagree, that if they have money left over, they aren't doing enough. And no, I'm not saying they should be broke or have a $0 account balance at the end of every month. There should always be an emergency reserve, and that goes without saying. But IMO, any "extra" money should be invested in the kingdom, not the stock market.
Lastly, the church is not a worldly corporation, nor is it a for-profit corporation. Its purpose, according to the Bible and the law, is not to earn a profit. An individual or a for-profit corporation may strive to earn a profit, increase wealth, get a return on their money, etc. and that's fine. But a church, by tax law or Bible, is not established for the purpose of seeking financial returns on their money or increasing wealth. A church's ROI should be souls saved. IMO.
BTJM. I dunno. Maybe we should all just agree to disagree. Nobody's making any new revelatory points and nobody's mind is changing. *shrug*