Folks with wealth understand that home ownership is better for the long term than renting.
Here's something funny: the founders of the U.S. fully understood the value of real property ownership. Do you have any idea what 40 acres and a mule would be worth today in someplace like Laguna Beach, California?!

. If you had that kind of property, you'd be a multi-millionaire on the land alone. That's an extreme example of appreciation. There are families in the U.S. with "old money" like that. They're big-scale, long-term thinkers.
The same principles apply on a smaller level. A home that is owned has the potential to appreciate. It also has a tax advantage of writing off the interest paid on the mortgage. It is a fundamental building block for wealth.
On the hand, a rented apartment does not appreciate. It has no tax advantages. Every rent payment has no investment value. The money is simply lost. While the tenant gets the convenience of not having to deal with ownership issues, the landlord builds wealth for the long term.
I know that not everybody can buy a home. That's unfortunate. Nevertheless, home ownership is better for building wealth than renting. It's not even close.